View University CalendarsView University DirectoriesSearch the SiteGo to the SitemapGo to the Homepage

 

Looking and learning

What is the place of astronomy at a liberal arts college?

By Megan Pickett
Associate professor of physics

Lawrence Today magazine, Summer 2007



I arrived at Lawrence University in the fall of 2006 and during that term I taught our introduction to astronomy course, Physics 110. As an astrophysicist, I have always enjoyed this class, because it offers a chance for students without a science background to learn about and appreciate their home in the universe. The course covers a lot of material not even dreamt of at the dawn of astronomy, and these discoveries help make the class an exciting time of learning.

Yet, my favorite memories of the course will always be those moments in which students did what astronomers have always done: look, and learn. When the students were outside measuring angles with homemade cross-staffs, or using meter-sticks to measure the height of the Sun during the term, or looking through a telescope at the Andromeda Galaxy, or even creating simulated digital messages to be sent into space, each was taking her or his place in a tradition of learning that goes back thousands of years — a tradition that is well-suited to a liberal arts education.

It has been said that astronomy is the oldest and noblest of the sciences. Forgetting for the moment that it is usually an astronomer who says that, there is a good deal of truth to the assertion, at least as far as astronomy’s ancient lineage is concerned. We’ll never know who first gazed upon a starry night sky and wondered.

Celestial mysteries viewed in darkness
I’ve thought about those nights, thousands of years in our past, and how unimaginably different they must have been from our own. It’s not so much all the advances that span the distance between my ancient counterparts and me. More than anything else, it is the darkness. Anybody who has been camping in the wilderness knows how dark the night sky can be. And yet, not completely dark: On a moonless night, under the best sky conditions possible, the human eye can see about 3,000 individual stars. That’s not all, either: five planets, a few nebulae, star clusters, and four galaxies can be seen, depending on where you live and when you look.

One of those galaxies is our own Milky Way, home to hundreds of billions of stars, including our own sun. The Milky Way is a ghostly stripe across the sky, sometimes just encircling the horizon, sometimes bisecting the starry dome.

All these celestial mysteries were there to be seen if you walked far enough from the group huddled around the fire, thousands of years ago. In the intervening millennia, streetlights have replaced campfires, extinguishing from view all but a handful of stars for most people. For better and for worse, we live in a time in which most people have never seen the Milky Way.

Making sense of the night sky
Astronomy’s roots are based on understanding the night sky, and though the tools have changed, astronomy is still at it, still trying to make sense of it all. The first astronomers filled an unfamiliar sky with familiar objects: animals, heroes, kings and queens, gods and goddesses, and the occasional farming implement: the constellations. It’s clear to me that those first astronomers had to be good storytellers with vivid imaginations. Anybody who has tried to make sense of a star map knows this, too. No matter how many times I’ve looked at it, you’ll never convince me that the five brightest stars in the constellation Camelopardalis look anything like a giraffe.

Later generations of astronomers would attempt to explain not just the patterns in the sky but also the patterns of movement: the seasonal change of stars, the motions of the planets, why the Moon apparently changed shape during the month, or when to expect the next eclipse. Ancient observatories took literally monolithic proportions with structures like Stonehenge, Abu Simbel, Uaimh na Greine, and the observatory at Mohenjo-daro. Much of the effort was devoted to a simple, but vital, endeavor: telling time by using the stars as a giant calendar.

Though not a science in the sense that a 21st-century scientist would recognize it, the achievements of ancient Greek, Persian, Indian, and Chinese astronomers mark a change in our relationship with the sky. The sky became something to study in detail. Modern astronomy itself would appear for the first time much later, with the work of Galileo and Newton and many others.

It has been nearly four centuries since Galileo first turned a telescope to the sky (though only 15 years since the Vatican admitted that the resulting trial for heresy was unjustified). Since then, telescopes have become larger and better, and the human eye has been replaced first with photographic plates and later electronic chips.

Observational astronomy has extended across the entire spectrum of light: from radio observatories that rival or even surpass the ancient stone structures in size to space-borne observatories that view the universe in infrared, ultraviolet, and gamma-ray wavelengths. Computerization of astronomical research is pervasive and not just in the control and operation of observatories.

Theoretical astronomy, once the province of pen, paper, and slide rule, has also grown tremendously — especially in the past two decades with the increasing availability of continually more powerful high-speed computing. Despite all these advances, a simple idea remains at the heart of astronomy: understanding our home in the universe. It is this idea and this effort that make astronomy a perfect field of study for a liberal arts college.

Looking and learning at Lawrence
It may seem that astronomy would be a difficult area of study to maintain at a liberal arts college, that it would be better suited to larger research universities with hordes of graduate students and postdoctoral researchers. Yet, many liberal arts colleges have included astronomy in their curricula and built observatories on their campuses. In fact, astronomy was considered an integral part of a student’s education, at least until the beginning of the 20th century.

There were practical aspects to an astronomical education — celestial navigation in particular — but astronomy was also thought to create a well-rounded student. These days, astronomy is a fully modern, quantitative science, and it overlaps significantly with physics, chemistry, geology, mathematics, computer science, and biology. As such, astronomy exposes students to a wide selection of knowledge. In a time in which multidisciplinary study is cherished, astronomy represents a wonderful opportunity for discovery. It has been my experience, too, that there is a general and intrinsic interest in astronomy. Everybody, it seems, brings some experience to the table — even if it is just looking up in awe and amazement.

How can astronomy thrive at a liberal arts college in general and Lawrence in particular? Part of the answer is surely the inherent interest of the subject and the keen intellect and curiosity our students bring to the classroom. In my short time here, I have been impressed and pleased with the willingness of Lawrentians to take time out of their schedule just to stand outside and look.

Two occasions last fall are illustrative: a remarkably comfortable November afternoon watching a rare transit of Mercury across the Sun and a remarkably uncomfortable December midnight observing session with students from my astronomy class. In both instances, students, staff, faculty, and passersby took the opportunity to look through a telescope — some for the first time. It did not matter that the conditions weren’t perfect or that, as a result, the images were blurry and faint (though the coffee and donuts surely didn’t hurt). What mattered was that we were looking and learning, together — sometimes for hours at a time.

Observation, theory, and research
Observations will always be at the heart of astronomy, and rightly so. Astrophysical theory is also important: some would say (as a theoretical astrophysicist, I would say) important in its own right, but it is also vital for understanding the observations in the first place. Here we are lucky, for all that is needed for astrophysical theory is access to a good computer and the time to work a problem.

Much of my own research focuses on the formation of the solar system, which occurred some five billion years ago, and is something that we obviously cannot witness directly. Nonetheless, we can simulate the early solar system in a computer. Access to major supercomputing centers off-campus certainly is helpful, but the continuing advances in computer technology have meant that simulations that required a year to complete a decade ago can be finished, on local machines, in a month or less.

In fact, even campus computers can be configured to participate in calculations; the SETI@Home Project, for example, has meant that millions of home computers are engaged in SETI, the Search for Extra-Terrestrial Intelligence.

However it is configured, access to astrophysical simulations means that students can be engaged in cutting-edge research on fundamental questions. These same students also develop technical skills in programming and data analysis of a more practical nature.

Research opportunities are important, but that is not the only contribution astronomy can make to Lawrence. We already offer a general course for the non-science major, and next year I will teach an upper-level topical course in astrophysics. Given the natural appeal of the material, I am also interested in developing a general education, team-taught course that brings together biological and geological aspects to the questions of Origins, namely: How did the universe form? How did the Earth form? What about Life?

One of my great hopes for the future of astronomy at Lawrence is the eventual construction of a remote observatory that would be operated from campus or would operate autonomously. Such remote/robotic telescopes are increasingly being designed and built by other universities — from large research university facilities like Indiana University’s “Roboscope” and “Spectrabot” to liberal arts college telescopes like the Luther College Remote Observatory — and are eminently possible for Lawrence University.

I believe the future of astronomy at Lawrence is promising and full of possibilities for students and the community. We have come a long way from those cold nights huddled by a fire surrounded by a dark sky filled with thousands of stars. The skies aren’t as dark anymore, but my sense is that we should always have some small part of the wonder and awe our ancestors must have had when they looked, and learned.


For more about Professor Pickett's research, see Inside Lawrence.