Math 217—Two-Factor ANOVA Example

An experiment is conducted to gauge the effect of both temperature setting and detergent type on the cleanliness of soiled t-shirts put through a washing cycle. Eighteen identically soiled t-shirts are randomly assigned to a treatment (that is, to a combination of temperature setting and detergent). Three wash-cycle temperatures are used: cold, warm, and hot. Two different detergents are considered: Detergent A and Detergent B. The response variable is a cleanliness rating (on a 1–10 scale). Note there are a total of 6 treatments, and since there are 18 t-shirts, we have 3 replications within each treatment. Shown below is the output from Minitab’s general linear model procedure (which is equivalent to a two-factor ANOVA analysis).

 

General Linear Model: Cleanliness Score versus Temperature, Detergent

Factor       Type   Levels  Values

Temperature  fixed       3  Cold, Hot, Warm

Detergent    fixed       2  A, B

 

Analysis of Variance for Cleanliness Score, using Adjusted SS for Tests

 

Source                 DF   Seq SS   Adj SS   Adj MS      F      P

Temperature             2  22.3333  22.3333  11.1667  14.36  0.001

Detergent               1  20.0556  20.0556  20.0556  25.79  0.000

Temperature*Detergent   2   0.7778   0.7778   0.3889   0.50  0.619

Error                  12   9.3333   9.3333   0.7778

Total                  17  52.5000

 

[Note: You can ignore the Seq SS column. The Adj SS column is simply the usual sum of squares we’ve discussed—it just has a different name within the general linear model procedure).

 

Before analyzing the results, we must check the normality and constant-variance conditions. Appropriate graphs of the residuals are shown below. The normality assumption is shaky, but perhaps plausible. The residual plot shows a fairly constant variation in the residuals. Hence, both assumptions appear to be roughly met.

 

The F-test for an interaction effect has a large P-value, which indicates there is no interaction effect. This can be seen visually via an interaction plot (also shown above).

 

Both main effects are significant. Hence, it’s appropriate to use Tukey’s procedure to get 95% simultaneous confidence intervals for the pairwise differences in means. Via Minitab:

 

Tukey 95.0% Simultaneous Confidence Intervals

Temperature = Cold subtracted from:

 

Temperature    Lower  Center  Upper  ------+---------+---------+---------+

Hot           1.3093  2.6667  4.024                         (-----*------)

Warm         -0.5240  0.8333  2.191               (------*------)

                                     ------+---------+---------+---------+

                                        -2.0       0.0       2.0       4.0

Temperature = Hot subtracted from:

 

Temperature   Lower  Center    Upper  ------+---------+---------+---------+

Warm         -3.191  -1.833  -0.4760  (------*------)

                                      ------+---------+---------+---------+

                                         -2.0       0.0       2.0       4.0

 

Tukey 95.0% Simultaneous Confidence Intervals

Detergent = A subtracted from:

 

Detergent  Lower  Center  Upper  ------+---------+---------+---------+

B          1.205   2.111  3.017  (-----------------*-----------------)

                                 ------+---------+---------+---------+

                                     1.50      2.00      2.50      3.00

 

Detergent B’s cleanliness rating is significantly higher, on average, than Detergent A. Furthermore, the cleanliness rating for hot water wash is higher, on average, than for both the cold temperature and the warm temperature. Do you think these results are practically significant? [Note: In lab we’ll discuss an example with a significant interaction.]