Section 4.5 Solutions

 

Important Note:  These solutions do not include tree diagrams, but trees can be a very important part of the solution process.

 

4.86

A = {household is prosperous}

B = {household is educated}

 

We know P(A) = 0.138, P(B) = 0.261, and P(A and B) = 0.082. To determine the union probability, simply apply the general addition rule:

P(A or B) = P(A) + P(B) – P(A and B) = 0.138 + 0.261 – 0.082 = 0.317

 

 

4.87

From exercise 4.86,

A = {household is prosperous}

B = {household is educated}.

 

Furthermore, P(A) = 0.138, P(B) = 0.261, and P(A and B) = 0.082.

 

Then, .

 

Since this conditional probability does not equal the unconditional probability of A, 0.138, the events A and B are not independent (i.e., they are dependent).

 

 

4.92

I’m not including the Venn diagram (only because I can’t create it in Word and post it to the Web). Please see me with questions about the diagram itself.

 

The probabilities are

P(A only) = 0.45

P(A and B only) = 0.1

P(A and C only) = 0.05

P(B only) = 0.25

P(B and C only) = 0.05

P(C only) = 0.1

P(A and B and C) = 0

 

 

4.93

To answer this, add up all the disjoint probabilities listed above:

P(A or B or C) = 0.45 + 0.1 + 0.05 + 0.25 + 0.05 + 0.1 = 1

 

(Note: You must answer this via the Venn diagram, as we don’t have a general addition rule for more than two events – such a rule exists, but it is more complicated than the two-event rule.)

 

 

4.94

From above,

P(A and B only) = 0.1

 

 

4.96

a.      To determine the probability of choosing a woman, simply divide the total number of women by the total number of people: P(woman) = (1119)/(1944) 0.576.

 

b.      From the table, P(woman and professional) = 39/1944, and P(professional) = 83/1944. Then P(woman | professional) = . (Note this probability could have been found directly from the table, by looking only at the professional column—which is what was given—and then determining the probability of being a woman: 39/83.)

 

c.       Note that P(woman) = 0.576 0.470 = P(woman | professional). Therefore, by definition, the events woman and professional are not independent—they are dependent (knowing a person is professional changes—decreases—the probability the person is a woman).

 

 

4.102

Let E represent a student studying education and W represent a student who is a woman. Then P(E) = 0.15, P(W) = 0.6, and P(W|E) = 0.8. Hence, by the definition of conditional probability and the general multiplication rule,

 

 

4.103

I’m not including the tree diagram (only because I can’t create it in Word and post it to the Web). Please see me with questions about the tree diagram itself.

 

Let NW represent a non-word error and W represent a word error. Furthermore, let C represent a caught error and NC represent a non-caught error.

 

Then, P(NW) = 0.25, P(W) = 0.75, P(C|NW) = 0.9, and P(C|W) = 0.7.

 

Now, by the general multiplication rule,

 P(C) = P(C and NW) + P(C and W) = P(NW)P(C|NW) + P(W)P(C|W) = (0.25)(0.9) + (0.75)(0.7) = 0.75.

 

 

4.105

I’m not including the tree diagram (only because I can’t create it in Word and post it to the Web). Please see me with questions about the tree diagram itself.

 

Let R represent regular gas, MG represent midgrade gas, and PR represent premium gas. Furthermore, let $20 represent a person spending at least $20.

 

Then, P(R) = 0.4, P(MG) = 0.35, P(PR) = 0.25, P($20|R) = 0.3, P($20|MG) = 0.5, and P($20|P) = 0.6.

 

Now, by the general multiplication rule,

P($20) = P(R and $20) + P(MG and $20) + P(PR and $20) = P(R)P($20|R) + P(MG)P($20|MG) + P(PR)P($20|PR) = (0.4)(0.3) + (0.35)(0.5) + (0.25)(0.6) = 0.445.

 

 

4.108

I’m not including the tree diagram (only because I can’t create it in Word and post it to the Web). Please see me with questions about the tree diagram itself.

 

Let B represent a bachelor’s degree, M represent a master’s degree, and D represent a doctoral degree. Furthermore, let W represent a woman and M represent a man.

 

Then, P(B) = 0.73, P(M) = 0.21, P(D) = 0.06, P(W|B) = 0.48, P(W|M) = 0.42, and P(W|D) = 0.29.

 

Now, by the general multiplication rule,

P(W and B) = P(B)P(W|B) = (0.73)(0.48) = 0.3504

 

and

 

P(W) = P(W and B) + P(W and M) + P(W and D) = P(B)P(W|B) + P(M)P(W|M) + P(D)P(W|D) = (0.73)(0.48) + (0.21)(0.42) + (0.06)(0.29) = 0.456.

 

Hence, .

 

 

4.112

I’m not including the tree diagram (only because I can’t create it in Word and post it to the Web). Please see me with questions about the tree diagram itself.

 

P(Jason carrier) = 1

P(Julianne carrier) = 2/3

P(child has CF | Julianne carrier) = 1/4

P(child has CF | Julianne not carrier) = 0

 

So, P(child doesn’t have CF | Julianne carrier) = 3/4 and P(child doesn’t have CF | Julianne not carrier ) = 1

 

P(Julianne carrier | child doesn’t have CF) =

P(Julianne carrier and child doesn’t have CF)/P(child doesn’t have CF) =

P(Julianne carrier and child doesn’t have CF)/P[(Julianne carrier and child doesn’t have CF) or (Julianne not carrier and child doesn’t have CF)] =

[P(Julianne carrier)P(child doesn’t have CF | Julianne carrier)]/[P(Julianne carrier)P(child doesn’t have CF | Julianne carrier) + P(Julianne not carrier)P(child doesn’t have CF | Julianne not carrier)] =

[(2/3)(3/4)]/[(2/3)(3/4) + (1/3)(1)] = 3/5